The Amazing Spider-Man

2012

Action / Adventure

0
IMDb Rating 6.9

Synopsis


Downloaded 34 times
6/24/2020 12:17:15 AM

1080p 720p
4.51 GB
BLURAY
Hindi
/ x264
PT2H16M
P/S 0 / 0
1.41 GB
AAC
BLURAY
Hindi
/ x264
PT2H16M
P/S 0 / 0

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by perjep-47333 10

I know people hate the suit i like it they tried to make special new look and i like it. Yes the amazing spiderman 2 was bad but this was very very good.

Read More
Reviewed by g-bodyl 8

Only five years after the universally-hated Spider-Man 3(not me, though), Columbia Pictures have decided to give Peter Parker and his alter ego, Spider-man a fresh start. This film is essentially quite similar to 2002&#39;s film, but also features a few differences mainly a personality change in Peter. I don&#39;t know if I like this film any better than the original trilogy. This film is action-packed, has a great cast, and a rather fun villain in &quot;The Lizard,&quot; but this film doesn&#39;t live up to the trilogy that gave Spider-Man a name for himself.<br/><br/>Marc Webb&#39;s film explores the origins of Spider-Man and also unlike the trilogy, we learn more about Peter&#39;s past including what happened to his family. As Peter is exploring his past, he is lead to his father&#39;s former partner who happens to be too smart for his own good. Also, Peter strikes a relationship with the daughter of the police captain, Gwen Stacy.<br/><br/>The acting is really not too bad. An Andrew Garfield/Emma Stone pairing is not as good as the Maguire/Dunst pairing, but they still do very good and it&#39;s nice to see some cockiness in Peter&#39;s attitude instead of complete nerdiness. The Lizard, played wonderfully by Rhys Ifans, is a good villain to watch. The rest of the cast rounded out with Denis Leary, Martin Sheen, and Sally Field gives this film some starpower.<br/><br/>Overall, this is definitely not a bad film and it&#39;s very entertaining. But we must ask ourselves, is this a necessary reboot? Honestly, I would rather have seen a Spider-Man 4, but who&#39;s to complain. This is a solid entry into the superhero genre despite really offering anything new. But hey I was entertained and that is all what matters. I rate this film 8/10.

Read More
Reviewed by TheNorwegianGuy 9

I admit that I too didn&#39;t exactly get that excited when I heard that this was in the making. The Sam Raimi trilogy was a fun ride, and the idea of making another Spider-Man movie with a completely new cast seemed strange and unnecessary. When the cast was announced, I got a little bit curious, but nothing more.<br/><br/>However, when I watched it, I got a whole other impression. I really liked it. The atmosphere was great, and perhaps a little darker than the Sam Raimi movies at times. I know many of you who read this will hate me for saying this, but I actually think this movie was a LITTLE bit better that the previous ones. Not much, but just a hint better. One thing is the cast. I really didn&#39;t like Tobey Maguire as Spider-Man that much. I didn&#39;t have a huge problem with him back then, but now when I saw this, I must say that I like Andrew Garfields &quot;version&quot; better. He&#39;s a little more tougher, both physically and in personality. Also, I think Emma Stone did good as Gwen Stacy. I liked her better as Peter Parker&#39;s girlfriend than Kirsten Dunst. The Villain, too, was great. I won&#39;t say more about him, not wanting to spoil anything.<br/><br/>When I read many of the reviews in here, I don&#39;t see much positivity about this movie. I think that&#39;s unfair. At least, it&#39;s mediocre. Giving this a 1/10 is criminally wrong. At least I think so. If you wonder if you should see this or not, at least give it a chance. Don&#39;t let the bad reviews scare you away.

Read More
Read more IMDb reviews

Torrent Related